Customize Consent Preferences

We use cookies to help you navigate efficiently and perform certain functions. You will find detailed information about all cookies under each consent category below.

The cookies that are categorized as "Necessary" are stored on your browser as they are essential for enabling the basic functionalities of the site. ... 

Always Active

Necessary cookies are required to enable the basic features of this site, such as providing secure log-in or adjusting your consent preferences. These cookies do not store any personally identifiable data.

Functional cookies help perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collecting feedback, and other third-party features.

No cookies to display.

Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics such as the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.

Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.

No cookies to display.

Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with customized advertisements based on the pages you visited previously and to analyze the effectiveness of the ad campaigns.

No cookies to display.

Other cookies are those that are being identified and have not been classified into any category as yet.

No cookies to display.

Reckitt Benckiser Statement re. Infant Formula Products

Statement Is In Response To A Verdict Received In Illinois State Court On 13 March In One Case Concerning Necrotising Enterocolotis (NEC)

Reckitt/Mead Johnson stands by the safety of our products.  We strongly reject any assertion that any of our products cause NEC, a serious gastrointestinal problem that mostly affects premature infants.      

While we continue to offer our deepest condolences to Ms. Watson, we strongly disagree with the jury’s decision to fault Mead Johnson and award damages. We continue to believe that the allegations from the plaintiff’s lawyers in this case were not supported by the science or experts in the medical community.  This was underscored during the trial by a dozen neonatologists.

It is important to note that this is a single verdict in a single case and should not be extrapolated.

This case, and others like it, exclusively involve products used under the strict supervision of neonatologists in neonatal intensive care units and provide lifesaving nutrition options for vulnerable premature infants.

We are of course, surprised and deeply disappointed with the verdict and will pursue all options to have it overturned.

http://www.reckitt.com/thisisreckitt

-ENDS-

Back to All News All Market News

Sign up for our Stock News Highlights

Delivered to your inbox every Friday

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.